Volume 3 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Odor Spaces

Open Access

Learning olfactory codes using matrix factorization on 2DG uptake patterns from rats

  • Amir Madany Mamlouk1
Flavour20143(Suppl 1):O3

DOI: 10.1186/2044-7248-3-S1-O3

Published: 16 April 2014

Recent studies based on both the analysis of odor descriptors [1] and psychophysical studies [2] have suggested that olfactory perception is mainly dominated by odor pleasantness. In contrast, findings on the sensory side [3] as well as on the perceptual side [4] indicate an odor perception space that is spanned by about 30 dimensions. On the way to understand the basic principles in the decoding of olfactory information from the single molecular compounds, we are focusing in this study on the first level of information processing in the sense of smell: The olfactory bulb (OB). We know that the olfactory epithelium is separated into four regions [5] of olfactory receptor protein expression and we expect a similar organization in the olfactory bulb [6]. With 2-DG-uptake-images, Johnson et al. [7] measured odorant-specific activity patterns, covering 98% of the bulbar surface with a resolution of one glomerulus per pixel. Using a database of 143 such bulbar activity fingerprints, we propose the so called non-negative matrix factorization [8] to decompose the data into a set of common features. These features can be best described as the coding alphabet while the uptake images of single molecular compounds resemble natural occurring code words. Interestingly, we can achieve three meaningful alphabets with a different size: 4, 6, and 9 digits. Only the last one is suitable for actually coding the compounds, as a single compound is evoking activity of only about 1/8 of the bulbar surface, with an average code word length of two to three digits. The other two decompositions might reflect the superglomerular organization of the receptor neurons in the bulb, like e.g. the above mentioned expression patterns and neuronal subnetworks that directly result from the targeting mechanisms guiding the neurons from the OE to the OB. We argue that the proposed decompositions are not only reflecting the chemotopic organization of the bulbus but rather giving a first hint on the coding scheme underlying olfactory perception.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Neuro- and Bioinformatics and the Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Science, University of Lübeck

References

  1. Madany Mamlouk A, Chee-Ruiter C, Hofmann UG, Bower JM: Quantifying olfactory perception: mapping olfactory perception space by using multidimensional scaling and self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing. 2003, 52-54: 591-597.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Khan RM, Luk C-H, Flinker A, Aggarwal A, Lapid H, Haddad R, Sobel N: Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J Neurosci. 2007, 27: 10015-23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haddad R, Khan R, Takahashi Y, Mori K, Harel D, Sobel N: A metric for odorant comparison. Nat Methods. 2008, 5: 425-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Madany Mamlouk A, Martinetz T: On the dimensions of the olfactory perception space. Neurocomputing. 2004, 58-60: 1019-1025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Ressler KJ, Sullivan SL, Buck LB: A zonal organization of odorant receptor gene expression in the olfactory epithelium. Cell. 1993, 73: 597-609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mori K, Takahashi YK, Igarashi KM, Yamaguchi M: Maps of odorant molecular features in the Mammalian olfactory bulb. Physiol Rev. 2006, 86: 409-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson Ba, Woo CC, Leon M: Spatial coding of odorant features in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb. J Comp Neurol. 1998, 393: 457-71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee DD, Seung HS: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature. 1999, 401: 788-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mamlouk; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement