Volume 3 Supplement 1
How animals negotiate odor space in evolutionary- and real-time
© Wyatt; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Published: 16 April 2014
The sensory odor space perceived by animals depends on their chemosensory repertoire – this information is used for the essential decisions in life [1, 2]. This information is also used to negotiate the real-world 3-dimensional odor landscape to find food or a mate.
The sensory odor space evolves as receptor families are co-opted and then undergo birth-and-death duplications, deletions and changes in response to natural selection. Insect and vertebrate olfactory receptors evolved independently. So, when male elephants and moths share the same odor space, with a shared molecule used as a female sex pheromone, we know that the receptors activated by the molecule are completely different and that they have evolved this sensitivity convergently.
Finding most odor sources relies on the second key concept underlying olfaction, combinatorial processing leading to synergy: a behavioral response to the combination greater than the response to individual components of the blend. The co-occurrence of odorant molecules in the same parcel of air or water is what gives meaning to the odorscape. A moth pheromone may consist of molecules which are not rare in themselves. However, when they co-occur in a unique combination, they become the guiding signal for a male to orient upwind. The excitement of particular multiple glomeruli gives the meaning to the signal. Orientation behavior to find the source relies on this real-time combinatorial processing of sensory inputs, responding millisecond by millisecond to the filamentous plumes of odorants carried by wind or air.
Anthropogenic CO2 and the acidification of the oceans are a threat to the odor space relied on by ocean life. As pH drops, the interactions between odorants and receptors change because the physicochemical properties of odor molecules are affected as are the binding sites of the receptors themselves.
Will this lead to chemosensory "blindness", with animals unable to find food or mates by the usual chemosensory stimuli? In the worst scenario, finding Nemo will become an impossible task.
- Wyatt TD: Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010, 196: 685-700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wyatt TD: Pheromones and animal behavior: chemical signals and signature mixtures. 2014, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.