Skip to main content
Download PDF

Is fat the sixth taste primary? Evidence and implications

Flavour volume 4, Article number: 5 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Taste is the chemical sense responsible for the detection of non-volatile chemicals in potential foods. For fat to be considered as one of the taste primaries in humans, certain criteria must be met including class of affective stimuli, receptors specific for the class of stimuli on taste bud cells (TBC), afferent fibres from TBC to taste-processing regions of the brain, perception independent of other taste qualities and downstream physiological effects. The breakdown products of the macronutrients carbohydrates (sugars) and proteins (amino acids) are responsible for the activation of sweet and umami tastes, respectively. Following the same logic, the breakdown products of fat being fatty acids are the likely class of stimuli for fat taste. Indeed, psychophysical studies have confirmed that fatty acids of varying chain length and saturation are orally detectable by humans. The most likely fatty acid receptor candidates located on TBC are CD36 and G protein-coupled receptor 120. Once the receptors are activated by fatty acids, a series of transduction events occurs causing the release of neurotransmitters towards afferent fibres signalling the brain. Whether fatty acids elicit any direct perception independent of other taste qualities is still open to debate with only poorly defined perceptions for fatty acids reported. Others suggest that the fatty acid taste component is at detection threshold only and any perceptions are associated with either aroma or chemesthesis. It has also been established that oral exposure to fat via sham feeding stimulates increases in blood TAG concentrations in humans. Therefore, overall, with the exception of an independent perception, there is consistent emerging evidence that fat is the sixth taste primary. The implications of fatty acid taste go further into health and obesity research, with the gustatory detection of fats and their contributions to energy and fat intake receiving increasing attention. There appears to be a coordinated bodily response to fatty acids throughout the alimentary canal; those who are insensitive orally are also insensitive in the gastrointestinal tract and overconsume fatty food and energy. The likely mechanism linking fatty acid taste insensitivity with overweight and obesity is development of satiety after consumption of fatty foods.

The sense of taste

The sense of taste presumably evolved to inform us about the nutritious or toxic value of potential foods. The primary organ responsible for the sense of taste is the tongue, which contains the biological machinery (taste receptors) to identify non-volatile chemicals in foods and non-foods we place in our mouth. Once a food enters the mouth, the tongue aids in the manipulation of the food, assisting breakdown and bolus formation before swallowing the food. During this critical period of food manipulation, the tongue is sampling chemicals in the food, and when food chemicals activate taste receptors, signals are sent from the taste receptors to processing regions of the brain. The signals are decoded by the brain, and we perceive the taste of the food, which could be one of five distinct qualities: sweet, sour, salty, bitter and umami.

It is perhaps appropriate to classify taste as a nutrient-toxin detection system, with the qualities (sweet, etc.) informing us via an associated hedonic response of suitability to swallow or reject, for example sweet elicited by sugars reflecting carbohydrate, sour elicited by free hydrogen ions (H+) reflecting excessive acid, umami elicited by glutamate and other amino acids reflecting protein content, salt elicited by sodium (Na+) and other ions reflecting mineral content, and bitter reflecting potential toxins in foods. Excessive bitterness or sourness is aversive and informs that the food in our mouth may cause harm and that the best action is to expectorate, whereas the qualities sweet, umami and salty are all appetitive within a relevant intensity range and inform that the food contains compounds we should ingest, in this case, essential nutrients such as carbohydrate, protein and minerals, respectively. As the taste system has evolved to detect the nutrients or toxins in foods prior to ingestion, it makes sense that fats, an essential energy-dense macronutrient required in limited amounts for energy and nutritional needs, would be detected through taste, as other macronutrients namely carbohydrates and proteins are detected through the tastes of sweet and umami.

Fat taste

Fat taste is an area of increasing interest particularly in chemosensory and nutrition research with the possibility that it may be linked with dietary consumption of fatty foods. The intake and regulation of dietary fats is considered especially important in the development of overweight and obesity, given their high energy density and palatability alongside their ability to promote excess energy intake. The intake and regulation of fats in the obese state appears especially problematic given that obese persons prefer higher fat foods that represent significant portions of the obese diet.

Fat has been classified as a taste as early as 330 BC by Aristotle and many other academics over the centuries [1]. More recently, fat has been associated with texture, flavour release and thermal properties in foods, but not the sense of taste [2]. This may seem like an irrelevant academic point, but the taste system is only activated when a saliva-soluble component of a potential food activates receptors on taste cells. Adding to the importance of the sense of taste is the interplay between taste cell activation and multiple digestive processes, therefore making the link between taste and fat intake very important, especially given the link dietary fat has with the development of obesity.

For fat to be generally accepted as a taste, it must meet five criteria: 1) There must be a distinct class of affective stimuli, and the stimuli responsible for fat taste are the breakdown products of fats and fatty acids [3, 4]. 2) There should be transduction mechanisms including receptors to change the chemical code of the stimuli to electrical signal. Emerging evidence suggests that CD36 and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) 120 are the most likely candidate receptors on taste bud cells (TBC), with multiple taste transduction mechanisms also involved [5]. 3) There must be neurotransmission of the electrical signal to processing regions of the brain [6, 7]. 4) There should be perceptual independence from other taste qualities. This criterion is controversial, and while there is certainly no obvious perception such as the sweetness of sucrose or saltiness of NaCl, some researchers claim less well-defined perceptions for fatty acids [8]. Others suggest that the fatty acid taste component is at detection threshold only and any definable perceptions are associated with either aroma or chemesthesis [4, 9]. 5) Finally, there must be physiological effects after activation of taste bud cells.

What follows is a brief summary of evidence supporting fat as the sixth taste and potential relevance of fat taste sensitivity to food consumption and development of obesity.

Fatty acids as stimuli

While it is well established that oxidised or reverted fatty acids or fatty acids at high concentrations are unpleasant to taste, the taste quality of fatty acids will vary according to their concentration in a food. The levels of fatty acids involved in fat taste are low enough not to be considered unpleasant in unspoiled food, yet sufficient to activate putative oral receptors. For example, the concentrations of fatty acids required for detection are within ranges which may be inherently present in edible fresh and processed foods (0.1%–3% w/v) [10], or perhaps made available through enzymatic hydrolysis by lingual lipase.

Lingual lipase

Lipase enzymes are very important as they break the triacylglycerols (TAGs) down so that free fatty acids can be transduced by cellular pathways. In humans, however, lingual lipase presence remains controversial. Data has suggested that lipolytic activity may be present in humans [9, 11], although it is unknown whether sufficient concentrations of lingual lipase are produced and whether this originates from endogenous sources or oral microbes. The presence of lipase does appear to have an influence on fatty acid thresholds with research showing that the addition of orlistat (lipase inhibitor) during testing increased fatty acid thresholds [12]. Overall, the weight of evidence suggests that free fatty acids in fatty foods will be in sufficient concentrations to activate putative receptors on taste cells.

Fatty acid taste receptors and transduction

CD36 transporter

One of the proposed mechanisms of oral fatty acid nutrient detection is via CD36, a fatty acid transporter [13]. CD36 is found in the oral cavity on human taste buds, specifically the circumvallate and foliate papillae [14]. Genetic variants of CD36 have been associated with variation of oleic acid (C18:1) detection threshold [12], providing further evidence for a role of CD36 for fat taste in humans.

G protein-coupled receptors

It has been proposed that CD36 may work together with other possible receptors like GPCRs in a signalling cascade to detect fatty acids [8]. GPCR120 (and possibly GPCR40) are activated by fatty acids initiating peripheral signalling cascade that includes a release of calcium that activates the cation channel transient receptor potential channel type M5 (TRPM5) [15]. GPCR120 has been expressed in the apical portion of types I and II cells from animal taste buds [16, 17] and, more recently, human taste buds [8].

Delayed rectifying potassium channels

Delayed rectifying potassium (DRK) channels are known to be implicated in the transduction pathway of a variety of taste stimuli. A study by Gilbertson found that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) slow down DRK polarisation on the foliate and circumvallate papillae taste cells and therefore allow fat to be detected [18].

Neurotransmitter release

A transduction mechanism that converts the chemical signal to an electrical signal is required to establish the taste component in dietary fat consumption. Previous studies suggested that the general chemoreception pathway starts from the fatty acids triggering the receptor or ion channel and results in the complex cascade that leads to the cell depolarization. The neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)) will then be secreted towards afferent nerve fibres which trigger the orosensory perception [19]. Further research is required relating specifically to neurotransmission of fat taste.

Perceptual independence

For all tastants, perception of the taste runs along a sensory concentration continuum (Figure 1). At very low concentrations, fatty acids may be detected, albeit with no taste quality attached, i.e. the concentration is too low to be recognised as a taste [20]. As the concentration increases, e.g. as a result of fat hydrolysis within a food, fatty acids may then be tasted or recognised. Once the concentration of fatty acids is high enough for recognition and supra-threshold, the flavour is generally unpleasant. At the supra-threshold level, it is likely that sensory systems other than taste are involved, for example smell or chemesthesis. Whether there is a recognisable taste quality associated with fat is still up for debate, but there is no doubt that a fat taste quality is not equivalent to easily identified qualities such as sweet or salty. One taste dimension for fatty acids that is reliably measurable is detection threshold, and research has shown that this measure is independent of detection thresholds for other basic tastes, thereby meeting the criteria for perceptual independence [4].

Figure 1
figure1

Relationship between chemical concentration, detection threshold and recognition threshold. The left-hand side represents chemical concentration from 0 M solution to a saturated solution. The right-hand side represents the perceptual relationship to increasing concentration and where fatty acid detection is placed in comparison to the five basic tastes.

Full size image

Physiological responses to oral fatty acid exposure

In humans, a 2.8-fold increase in plasma TAG concentrations was recorded in response to oral fat loads. These effects are not observed with sensory-matched fat mimetics, textural cues or smell [21, 22], supporting the view that fatty acids activate putative taste receptors that generate an immediate signal which is transmitted to other parts of the periphery, preparing the body for fat digestion and absorption. Additional investigations have also reported fat-specific cephalic phase responses following oral stimulation with fats that include increases in lipase secretion [23]; transient stimulation of gastrointestinal hormones, including cholecystokinin (CCK), pancreatic polypeptide (PP) and peptide YY (PYY) [24, 25]; as well as variations in postprandial glucose and insulin [24, 26].

Relevance of fat taste to development of obesity

In rodents, differences in fat taste sensitivity appear to influence fat preference, consumption and predisposition to obesity, hinting at a novel role of the taste system in the control of both food intake and weight regulation [27–29]. It has been established that different rodent strains are selectively more or less sensitive to fatty acids and that differences in fat taste are inherently linked to dietary intake and preference.

For example, when wild-type mice were compared to GPCR120 and GPCR40 knock-out mice, the knock-out mice showed an attenuated preference for linoleic acid (C18:2) and C18:1, suggesting that GPCR120 and GPCR40 play a role in the perception of fatty acids [16]. Furthermore, when GPCR120-deficient mice were fed a high-fat diet, they developed obesity and other side effects of metabolic syndrome, indicating a role in regulation of energy intake [30]. Moreover, a high-fat diet reduced expression of CD36 in obese rats which may be associated with fat taste adaptation and also indicates a role in regulation of energy intake [31]. There is also the possibility that CD36 may be involved with the onset of fat-induced satiety [32]. Animal studies have strongly suggested a link between oral sensitivity to fatty acids and development of obesity, with those animals less sensitive to fatty acids unable to adequately regulate intake and overconsuming energy. In other words, the more you taste fat, the less fat you eat.

A feature of the taste system is the large individual differences in sensitivity to compounds [33]. Differential dietary practices amongst obese and lean individuals, especially with regard to fat consumption and preference, are also well established, for example obese individuals have shown a preference for high-fat foods and prefer a greater concentration of fat within specific food matrices when compared to lean individuals [34, 35]. Such variations in the taste system along with dietary intake and behaviours have been the focus of recent research studies.

The relationship between oral fatty acid sensitivity, dietary fat intake and body mass index (BMI) has recently been investigated by our group and others [9, 36–40]. In general, it was found that those who were more sensitive to the fatty acid C18:1 had lower energy intakes and consumed less total dietary fats and were also better at detecting the fat content of food (custard) [9, 37, 38]. Another study by Stewart et al. extended these results and also found a relationship in humans between fatty acid sensitivity, food consumption and dietary behaviours, whereby those who were hyposensitive consumed more high-fat dairy products, high-fat spreads and fatty red meat [38]. Conversely, hypersensitive individuals reported behaviours including trimming the fat off meat and avoiding saturated fats [38]. Additionally, various human studies have reported that participants who were classified as hypersensitive to fatty acids also had lower BMIs than hyposensitive individuals [9, 38, 39, 41]; however, other studies have failed to find such associations [37, 42]. It has also been reported that fatty acid sensitivity can be modulated by dietary fat, with a high-fat diet causing attenuation of fat taste thresholds in lean individuals, while a low-fat diet results in increased sensitivity to fatty acids [37]. Keller et al. has suggested a possible association between polymorphisms in the CD36 receptor, oral fat perception and fat preference in human subjects [43]. Changes in the preference of high-fat foods have been observed following 12- to 24-week dietary interventions involving fat-restriction, which leads to a decrease in the pleasantness, taste and preference of high-fat foods, suggesting that the experience of fats in foods can be modulated by the diet [44].

The association between fat taste and obesity is probably a result of a coordinated alimentary canal response to dietary fat [45, 46] (Figure 2). Indeed, a link between oral fatty acid chemoreception and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) responses to fatty acid has been established with obese individuals having impaired responses to fatty acid in the oral cavity and the GIT [12, 37, 41, 47, 48] compared to healthy-weight subjects. The presence of fats in the small intestine in healthy, normal-weight subjects generates potent satiety signals [46]. Gastric emptying is slowed, gut hormones CCK and PYY are released, and ghrelin is inhibited [49, 50], altogether causing suppression of energy intake. These physiological satiety mechanisms may be impaired in the obese with subjects voluntarily consuming twice as much energy from fat products as non-obese [41, 51]. A recent study illustrated the link between fatty acid sensitivity, fat consumption and satiety. When the population was stratified according to fat taste sensitivity, those who were classified as orally hyposensitive to C18:1 found fat the least satiating macronutrient, while those who were classified as hypersensitive to C18:1 found fat the most satiating. This result was specific for the high-fat meal; this was not observed following a high-carbohydrate, high-protein or balanced meal [36].

Figure 2
figure2

Schematic representation of fatty acid chemoreception in the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract (alimentary canal) in lean (left) and obese (right) individuals. (1) Fat is present in foods in the form of TAG; free fatty acids are generated during the breakdown of fats and by lipase enzymes in the oral cavity. (2) Fatty acids access putative receptors (CD36, GPCR40, GPCR41, GPCR43, GPCR120 and delayed rectifying potassium (DRK) channels) within taste cells; lean individuals have greater quantities of these receptors compared to obese individuals. The receptors elicit the release of intracellular Ca2+ that in turn activates neurotransmitters and hormones associated with the cephalic response. (3) Following fat ingestion, gastric and pancreatic lipase plays a further role in the hydrolysis of fats enabling access to fatty acid receptors on enteroendocrine cells, stimulating satiety hormones and uptake of fatty acids. As a consequence, sensitivity to ghrelin, which is responsible for hunger stimulation, is inhibited, while the satiety-inducing hormone leptin is released as are the hormones CCK, PYY and GLP-1. (4) In a lean individual, expression of fatty acid receptors is greater, therefore increasing fat sensing ability through the alimentary canal and thereby decreasing energy intake. (5) In comparison, obese individuals have decreased expression of fatty acid receptors, attenuating fat sensing ability and increasing energy intake. Reproduced from [52].

Full size image

Summary

The existence of a sixth taste elicited by the digestive products of fat (fatty acids) is yet to be confirmed; however, a growing body of evidence from humans and other animal species provides support for this proposition. In support for a functional significance of fat taste, differences in taste sensitivity for fat appear to predict certain dietary behaviours, i.e. decreased sensitivity to fat taste is associated with an increased consumption of fat, and this has been reported in both animal and human studies. Moreover, sensitivity to fat can be modulated by the diet, i.e. consumption of a high-fat diet appears to maximise the body’s capacity for fat absorption, with no changes in appetite, suggesting that such changes may accompany or encourage excess fat intake and obesity. These data propose a direct role of the taste system in the consumption and preference of high-fat foods, which may be linked to the development of obesity given that differences in BMI have also been linked to oral fatty acid sensitivity. The mechanism allowing for increased consumption of fat is proposed to be via satiety or fullness signals, as associations in both taste and digestive responses to fat have been reported. The next 5 to 10 years should reveal, conclusively, whether fat can be classified as the sixth taste, but no matter what, there appears to be a functional significance to oral chemosensing of fats.

Abbreviations

GPCR:

G protein-coupled receptor

TBC:

Taste bud cell

TAG:

Triacylglycerol

DRK:

Delayed rectifying potassium

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

CCK:

Cholecystokinin

PP:

Pancreatic polypeptide

PYY:

Peptide YY

GIT:

Gastrointestinal tract.

References

  1. 1.

    Aristotle: De Anima. 350 BC.

  2. 2.

    Fennema O: Food Chemistry. 4th edition. Edited by: Srinivasan D, Parkin KL, Fennema OR. Boca Raton: CRC; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chale-Rush A, Burgess JR, Mattes RD: Evidence for human orosensory (taste?) sensitivity to free fatty acids.Chem Senses 2007,32(5):423–431. 10.1093/chemse/bjm007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Newman L, Keast R: The test retest reliability of fatty acid taste threshold.Chemosens Percept 2013,6(2):70–77. 10.1007/s12078-013-9143-2

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gilbertson TA, Khan NA: Cell signaling mechanisms of oro-gustatory detection of dietary fat: advances and challenges.Prog Lipid Res 2014, 53:82–92.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Rolls ET, Critchley HD, Browning AS, Hernandi I, Lenard L: Responses to the sensory properties of fat of neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex.J Neurosci 1999,19(4):1532–1540.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    De Araujo IE, Rolls ET: Representation in the human brain of food texture and oral fat.J Neurosci 2004,24(12):3086–3093. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0130-04.2004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galindo MM, Voigt N, Stein J, van Lengerich J, Raguse JD, Hofmann T, Meyerhof W, Behrens M: G protein-coupled receptors in human fat taste perception.Chem Senses 2012,37(2):123–139. 10.1093/chemse/bjr069

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Stewart JE, Feinle-Bisset C, Golding M, Delahunty C, Clifton PM, Keast RS: Oral sensitivity to fatty acids, food consumption and BMI in human subjects.Brit J Nutr 2010,104(1):145–152. 10.1017/S0007114510000267

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Che Man Y, Moh M, van der Voort F: Determination of free fatty acids in crude palm oil and refined-bleached-deodorised palm olein using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.J Am Oil Chem Soc 1999, 76:485–490. 10.1007/s11746-999-0029-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kulkarni BV, Mattes RD: Lingual lipase activity in the orosensory detection of fat in humans.Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2014,306(12):R879-R885. 10.1152/ajpregu.00352.2013

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pepino MY, Love-Gregory L, Klein S, Abumrad NA: The fatty acid translocase gene CD36 and lingual lipase influence oral sensitivity to fat in obese subjects.J Lipid Res 2012,53(3):561–566. 10.1194/jlr.M021873

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abumrad N: CD36 may determine our desire for dietary fats.J Clin Invest 2005,115(11):2955–2967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Simons PJ, Kummer JA, Luiken JJ, Boon L: Apical CD36 immunolocalization in human and porcine taste buds from circumvallate and foliate papillae.Acta Histochem 2011,113(8):839–843. 10.1016/j.acthis.2010.08.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu P, Shah BP, Croasdell S, Gilbertson TA: Transient receptor potential channel type M5 is essential for fat taste.J Neurosci 2011,31(23):8634–8642. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6273-10.2011

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cartoni C, Yasumatsu K, Ohkuri T, Shigemura N, Yoshida R, Godinot N, le Coutre J, Ninomiya Y, Damak S: Taste preference for fatty acids is mediated by GPR40 and GPR120.J Neurosci 2010,30(25):8376–8382. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0496-10.2010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Matsumura S, Mizushige T, Yoneda T, Iwanaga T, Tsuzuki S, Inoue K, Fushiki T: GPR expression in the rat taste bud relating to fatty acid sensing.Biomed Res 2007,28(1):49–55. 10.2220/biomedres.28.49

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gilbertson TA: Gustatory mechanisms for the detection of fat.Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998,8(4):447–452. 10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80030-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dando R, Roper SD: Cell-to-cell communication in intact taste buds through ATP signalling from pannexin 1 gap junction hemichannels.J Physiol 2009,587(24):5899–5906. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.180083

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Keast R, Roper J: A complex relationship among chemical concentration, detection threshold, and suprathreshold intensity of bitter compounds.Chem Senses 2007,32(3):245–253. 10.1093/chemse/bjl052

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mattes RD: The taste of fat elevates postprandial triacylglycerol.Physiol Behav 2001,74(3):343–348. 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00578-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mattes RD: Oral exposure to butter, but not fat replacers elevates postprandial triacylglycerol concentration in humans.J Nutr 2001,131(5):1491–1496.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wøjdemann M, Olsen O, Nørregaard P, Sternby B, Rehfeld JF: Gastric lipase secretion after sham feeding and cholinergic blockade.Dig Dis Sci 1997,42(5):1070–1075. 10.1023/A:1018805623669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Robertson MD, Jackson KG, Williams CM, Fielding BA, Frayn KN: Prolonged effects of modified sham feeding on energy substrate mobilization.Am J Clin Nutr 2001,73(1):111–117.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wisén O, Björvell H, Cantor P, Johansson C, Theodorsson E: Plasma concentrations of regulatory peptides in obesity following modified sham feeding (MSF) and a liquid test meal.Regul Pept 1992,39(1):43–54. 10.1016/0167-0115(92)90007-H

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chavez-Jauregui RN, Mattes RD, Parks EJ: Dynamics of fat absorption and effect of sham feeding on postprandial lipema.Gastroenterology 2010,139(5):1538–1548. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Takeda M, Imaizumi M, Fushiki T: Preference for vegetable oils in the two-bottle choice test in mice.Life Sci 2000,67(2):197–204. 10.1016/S0024-3205(00)00614-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Takeda M, Sawano S, Imaizumi M, Fushiki T: Preference for corn oil in olfactory-blocked mice in the conditioned place preference test and the two-bottle choice test.Life Sci 2001,69(7):847–854. 10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01180-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Verhagen JV, Rolls ET, Kadohisa M: Neurons in the primate orbitofrontal cortex respond to fat texture independently of viscosity.J Neurophysiol 2003,90(3):1514–1525. 10.1152/jn.00320.2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ichimura A, Hirasawa A, Poulain-Godefroy O, Bonnefond A, Hara T, Yengo L, Kimura I, Leloire A, Liu N, Iida K, Choquet H, Besnard P, Lecoeur C, Vivequin S, Ayukawa K, Takeuchi M, Ozawa K, Tauber M, Maffeis C, Morandi A, Buzzetti R, Elliott P, Pouta A, Jarvelin MR, Körner A, Kiess W, Pigeyre M, Caiazzo R, Van Hul W, Van Gaal L, et al.: Dysfunction of lipid sensor GPR120 leads to obesity in both mouse and human.Nature 2012,483(7389):350–354. 10.1038/nature10798

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang XJ, Zhou LH, Ban X, Liu DX, Jiang W, Liu XM: Decreased expression of CD36 in circumvallate taste buds of high-fat diet induced obese rats.Acta Histochem 2011,113(6):663–667. 10.1016/j.acthis.2010.09.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Naville D, Duchampt A, Vigier M, Oursel D, Lessire R, Poirier H, Niot I, Bégeot M, Besnard P, Mithieux G: Link between intestinal CD36 ligand binding and satiety induced by a high protein diet in mice.PLoS One 2012,7(1):e30686. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030686

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Keast RSJ, Dalton P, Breslin PAS: Flavour interactions at the sensory level. In Flavour Perception. Edited by: Taylor A. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004:228–255.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bray GA, Paeratakul S, Popkin BM: Dietary fat and obesity: a review of animal, clinical and epidemiological studies.Physiol Behav 2004,83(4):549–555. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.08.039

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rissanen A, Hakala P, Lissner L, Mattlar CE, Koskenvuo M, Rönnemaa T: Acquired preference especially for dietary fat and obesity: a study of weight-discordant monozygotic twin pairs.Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002,26(7):973–977.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Keast RS, Azzopardi KM, Newman LP, Haryono RY: Impaired oral fatty acid chemoreception is associated with acute excess energy consumption.Appetite 2014, 80C:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stewart J, Keast RS: Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects.Int J Obesity 2012, 36:834–842. 10.1038/ijo.2011.155

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Stewart J, Newman LP, Keast RS: Oral sensitivity to oleic acid is associated with fat intake and body mass index.Clin Nutr 2011, 30:838–844. 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.06.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Martínez-Ruiz NR, López-Díaz JA, Wall-Medrano A, Jiménez-Castro JA, Angulo O: Oral fat perception is related with body mass index, preference and consumption of high-fat foods.Physiol Behav 2014, 129:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tucker RM, Edlinger C, Craig BA, Mattes RD: Associations between BMI and fat taste sensitivity in humans.Chem Senses 2014,39(4):349–357. 10.1093/chemse/bju006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stewart JE, Seimon RV, Otto B, Keast RS, Clifton PM, Feinle-Bisset C: Marked differences in gustatory and gastrointestinal sensitivity to oleic acid between lean and obese men.Am J Clin Nutr 2011, 93:703–711. 10.3945/ajcn.110.007583

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Running CA, Mattes RD, Tucker RM: Fat taste in humans: sources of within- and between-subject variability.Prog Lipid Res 2013,52(4):438–445. 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.04.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Keller KL, Liang LC, Sakimura J, May D, van Belle C, Breen C, Driggin E, Tepper BJ, Lanzano PC, Deng L, Chung WK: Common variants in the CD36 gene are associated with oral fat perception, fat preferences, and obesity in African Americans.Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012,20(5):1066–1073. 10.1038/oby.2011.374

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mattes RD: Fat preference and adherence to a reduced-fat diet.Am J Clin Nutr 1993,57(3):373–381.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mattes RD: Fat taste and lipid metabolism in humans.Physiol Behav 2005,86(5):691–697. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.058

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Stewart J, Feinle-Bisset C, Keast RS: Fatty acid detection during food consumption and digestion: associations with ingestive behavior and obesity.Prog Lipid Res 2011,50(3):225–233. 10.1016/j.plipres.2011.02.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Samra RA: Fats and satiety. In Fat Detection: Taste, Texture, and Post Ingestive Effects. Edited by: Montmayeur JP, le Coutre J. Boca Raton: CRC; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Brennan IM, Luscombe-Marsh ND, Seimon RV, Otto B, Horowitz M, Wishart JM, Feinle-Bisset C: Effects of fat, protein, and carbohydrate and protein load on appetite, plasma cholecystokinin, peptide YY, and ghrelin, and energy intake in lean and obese men.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2012,303(1):G129-G140. 10.1152/ajpgi.00478.2011

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Blundell J, Macdiarmid J: Fat as a risk factor for overconsumption: satiation, satiety and patterns of eating.J Am Diet Assoc 1997,97(7):63–69. 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00733-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Feinle C, O'Donovan D, Doran S, Andrews JM, Wishart J, Chapman I, Horowitz M: Effects of fat digestion on appetite, APD motility, and gut hormones in response to duodenal fat infusion in humans.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2003,284(5):G798-G807.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Blundell JE, Burley VJ, Cotton JR, Lawton CL: Dietary fat and the control of energy intake: evaluating the effects of fat on meal size and postmeal satiety.Am J Clin Nutr 1993,57(5):772S-777S. Discussion 777S–778S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Newman L, Haryono R, Keast R: Functionality of fatty acid chemoreception: a potential factor in the development of obesity?Nutrients 2013,5(4):1287–1300. 10.3390/nu5041287

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

RSJK is funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia (Grant 1043780) and Horticulture Australia Limited (BS12006).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Sensory Science Group, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia

    Russell SJ Keast & Andrew Costanzo

Authors
  1. Russell SJ Keast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Costanzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell SJ Keast.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RSJK conceived of the article and drafted the manuscript. AC helped draft the manuscript and revised it for publication. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keast, R.S., Costanzo, A. Is fat the sixth taste primary? Evidence and implications. Flavour 4, 5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-4-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fat taste
  • Fatty acid
  • Obesity
  • Taste reception
  • Chemesthesis

Flavour

ISSN: 2044-7248